Mogło to dotyczyć chikenloopa do 2012 roku,a nie 2013r tak jak napisałem.Kupowałem latawca jako 2013,więc myślałem ,że bar też jest 2013 ,a mógł być rok starszy.Można go poznać,po napisie BEST w kształcie kwadrata na tym czerwonym elemancie.
http://www.kiteforum.com/viewtopic.php? ... &start=120......."Do we think the bar designer decided that customers with defective bars would not get the spare part because he wanted everyone who bought something he designed to hate him?" - Not only were the stopper balls on the 2010-2011 CL releases not chamfered (mfg defect in skipped machining step), the release system was of a faulty design. On the 2010-2012 CL design, a piece of plastic was put into a situation where normal load would cause elongation, and that elongation resulted in a critical tolerance issue. This made the CL release without activation and eventually led to the CL not staying loaded even with light loads. No engineer should keep his job after putting plastic in a position of elongation when that elongation would cause critical tolerances to become out of specification resulting in a complete failure of the safety device. Plastic is never put into a position (by a real engineer) where deformation (in this case elongation) would cause critical tolerances to be exceeded. This is simply the nature of plastics as a material. If the Best CL release system of 2010-2012 was on a system that killed to a single front line, the issue would not have been as severe. But on a release of the back lines to both fronts, no control of the kite’s position could be maintained unless the CL could be again reloaded. The engineer should have been fired and all of those releases recalled. The recall should have taken place, at latest, early 2012. To this date, these releases are still out there causing many “swim in” and unintentionally released kites to “rake” the beach.....