jacekdaktera pisze:March_in. To nie prowokacja . Słowo. Może nie potrzebnie tak ostro, może mało delikatnie o co przeciez namawiam. Ale przepraszam zdając sobie z tego sprawę.Napisz co chcesz zrobić z kompletem informacji dot. Janka. Jak ją wykorzystasz w przyszłości. Jestem przekonany, że pisze i mówię o przyszłości. Każdy jak na razie ucieka przed opowiedzia. Dlaczego.
skoro ty tak o wartosciach i wychowaniu.to moze pozwolisz ze zadam ci pytanie, ktore w czesci pierwszej twojej historii zacytowalem, nie wiem czy przeczytales co mialem do powiedzenia bo wcale sie do tego nie odniosles w tamtej czesci. wiec moze jeszcze raz:
x wrote:
"I think the whole thing comes down to one question... is it responsible to take risks which have a high probability of ending in the need to be rescued by non connected people risking their lives to help you. What if one or more of your rescuers is killed attempting to save you... is it worth it?"
y wrote:
"If I can't talk my buddies into following me and don't want to pay a stranger a couple hundred bucks to follow me in a cheap little boat just in case there is trouble, is it reasonable to make others responsible (and at risk of harm or death) for my poor judgment without their consent?"
z wrote:
If you want to do a crossing, then go for it.
If you want to do it with a minimalist approach and accept the consequences, I say go for it.
If you want to have some backup "just in case" of trouble, then arrange for it.
It's your adventure. Be responsible for your actions, accept the consequences and go for it.
Bringing a radio beacon while having made no backup plans makes a very clear statement that the "adventurer" is not so willing to solely accept the consequences of his actions and is planning to hold others responsible for his safety.